Seated, hearing the priest to speak. He started a fear, a fear to faint. I started to sweat, my head started to twirl, I was idiot, I held in the bank, seemed that it went to fall. There I raised and I was even so I felt very, much fear. Fear to feel fear, fear of multitude, fear of speaking in public. As today exactly, that I had an event, and I was not, because I trembled with fear alone in thinking about you in this event.
In the interview, we perceive in the story of the patient who when crisis in the church happened 1, great part of repudiated it to the population speaking that they were on malignant things to the side spiritual of the same one. This disturbed it as much that until today it does not frequent the church which happened its 1 crisis. Another important moment was when the interviewed one mentioned that in the day of interview it would have an event important and alone to think already was tremendous, that is a consequence of antecipatrias crises. This fact reaffirms what it meets in the literature, that generally the patient one passes constantly for a psychological pressure of proper ' ' eu' ' , That is, if it charges trying demasiadamente to hinder that the crises occur, without perceiving that when suffering from these antecipatrias crises it premakes use the panic crises. Thus, we verify that, the carrying patient of the S.P has full conscience that is sick and that needs aid (treatment). The patient very suffers when thinking constantly on its way to act, mainly after the crises, however she does not obtain to control the symptoms. As some stories in literature the panic crises are indescritveis and perhaps the worse one of the psychic and organic experiences that somebody can try. This posthumous suffering is what it is called of ' ' depression after-crise' ' according to some scholars in the subject.